Home Developers – Juicy Property Taxes – All that Fire Department “Overtime” – and the Orange County Fire Authority – “See – You Need Us Factor” – Don’t Feel Bad – it’s “Just So Normal” to Wonder about what Caused the Tustin California MCAS Blimp Hangar Fire

More than 70 Orange County firefighters battled a stubborn fire at one of two iconic, 17-story-high hangars at the shuttered Tustin Air Base early Tuesday morning, Nov. 7, authorities said, a blaze that will lead to the hangar’s demolition.

The cause of the fire — and where it began — so far were unclear.

Fire crews were called to the north hangar in Tustin just before 12:55 a.m. and began attacking the blaze with a defensive strategy from outside the building, Orange County Fire Authority Capt. Thanh Nguyen said.

No injuries were reported and firefighters did not believe anyone was inside the building when the fire broke out, he added.

“The biggest fear is collapse and getting our firefighters injured,” Nguyen said.

OCFA Chief Brian Fennessy said at a morning news conference the fire was expected to stretch across the length of the hangar, which will ultimately “need to be demolished”.

He said it could take a lengthy amount of time before the fire was out. When firefighters arrived, the blaze was intense.

“We expect the fire to continue … possibly until it gets to the other side of the hangar, and whether that be the end of the day, tomorrow — whether it stops at some point in between, we don’t know,” Fennessy said. “So at this point we’re standing back, keeping people and firefighters away and we’re watching.”

Flames tore through the roof of the massive structure. There appears to have been a partial roof collapse.

In fact, just before 6:30 a.m., firefighters said they planned to allow the hangar to collapse so that ground crews “can move in closer, and aggressively work to extinguish the fire.”

Firefighters at one point received assistance from helicopters, including a Boeing CH-47 Chinook, which can drop up to 3,000 gallons of water.

“It’s not a regular tactic to use a helicopter for a structure fire — however, this is not a regular fire, either,” Nguyen said.

“It was felt that perhaps — with our agency helicopter and the large Chinook — it was possible for us to maybe slow it down and maybe get our ladder trucks in close enough to be able to slow it down,” Fennessy said. “That was not the case, so we cancelled them and returned them.”

Smoke rising from the hangar was going straight up.

Arson investigators were on the scene. Police do regular patrol checks of the hangars, Tustin Chief Stu Greenberg said. He asked anyone with information about the fire or any activity at the hangar in previous days to call police.

The fire is in one of two hangars that once housed blimps used in World War II and later provided cover for military helicopters.

The hangars were built in 1942 during World War II, Fennessy said, and are two of the largest wooden structures ever constructed. They were named historic civil engineering landmarks in 1993.

The hangars have been featured in television and films, including for ”JAG, ” ”The X Files,” ”Austin Powers,” ”Pearl Harbor ” and ”Star Trek.”

For some time, there were plans to raze the north hangar and use the space to construct homes and a regional park, but plans never materialized. In August 2021, the City Council voted to scrap the park and maintain the site.

Tustin Mayor Austin Lumbard called it a sad day for the city and said the two hangars are more than just structures.

“It’s a personal thing to a lot of (the) Tustin community,” Lumbard said. “They mean so much to the city’s past, to the region’s military history.”

Before the fire, Lumbard said, a decision hadn’t been made on the ultimate faith for the north hangar. It was damaged by heavy winds in 2013 and had been supported by two cranes.

“It’s just been kind of sitting there, damaged,” Lumbard said. “There’s community sentiment that wants to save the hangars, (but it’s) very very cost prohibitive to repair those things and bring them up to commercial code.”

Lumbard said the city looks forward to collaborating on what ultimately will happen to the remaining hangar and the 85 acres surrounding it.

The city, he said, has recently invested in new fencing, adding no trespassing signs and cutting overgrown vegetation in the area.

Councilmember Letitia Clark said the U.S. Navy needed to do more.

“I think we did everything we could in our power to really ensure that the site was clean and safe,” Clark said. “I think the hindsight-20/20 part is really more on the Navy.”

Clark said the city has an operational agreement with the Navy, which owns both hangars.

“I hope that the Navy is now aware that there’s probably more that they could have done,” Clark said. “And, hopefully, there’s more they can do now in terms of helping us move forward with making sure the site is clean and that we can move forward to fully transitioning ownership of the (south) hangar from them to us.”

U.S. Navy officials could not be reached comment.

Tuesday morning, every few minutes, the dying structure emitted a loud, low rumble as the metal and wood inner lattice still holding up the curved roof started to give way, sending debris crashing down to the hangar floor in burning heaps.

By 9 a.m., fire crackled along the edges of the gaping hole now making up nearly half of the old hangar. Flames ripped through the interior, bursting through the hangar’s outer shell in spots.

The powerful fire created a billowing column of brownish, white smoke that helped ripped panels from the outside of the building, sending them twirling up in the air like confetti.

The loud snaps and pops of flames and the explosions periodically rumbling through the old structure served as the death throes of one of Orange County’s most iconic buildings.

Like giant soda cans tipped over in the sand, the twin, hulking hangars at the air base have sat here for longer than many locals have called Orange County home.

The air base was one of the first sights Curtis Schneider, 61, could remember when his family first drove through the area after moving here in the 1970s.

In a T-shirt, shorts, sandals and sunglasses, Schneider stood just behind the open driver’s side door of his car, holding his phone up to capture the destruction. When one loud blast roared from the burning building, he tensed up.

“Whoa!” he said, as others in the group of about 50 onlookers hooted and hollered. Still watching, Schneider took a quick drag from his vape pen.

He recalled standing on the floor of the hangar beneath its towering walls for different events over the years, when visitors were still allowed inside.

“We saw car shows in there, helicopter shows,” Schneider said. “We had some good times in that hangar.”

Tammy Murphy, 65, looked on in horror and wonder as decades of Southern California history burned to the ground in front of her. Murphy stood with her two grandchildren just behind a chain-link fence about a quarter of a mile from the hangar.

“Oh my god — so many emotions,” she said. “These were here when I was a kid growing up.”

She remembered seeing the Blue Angels perform here. Her father was in the military and would take her to shop at the base grocery store.

“It was bustling,” Murphy said, before the facility was closed for good in the 1990s.

Local officials tried for years to develop a plan for what to do with the hangars. It’s a history Schneider said he knew well. He answered his cellphone and spoke to the caller on speaker phone.

“That’s a historic building,” the caller said.

Schneider replied: “It was.”

Red embers could be seen along the remaining roof edge, with and smoke billowing up.

Lori Spiak, a lifelong Tustin resident, gasped at the sight.

Spiak said she hopes the south hangar is maintained — she and her friends have talked about how it could be turned into a concert venue or a soundstage.

Adora Cole said the hangar has been a fixture in her life since she was a child; she remembers Marines going by in with their pickups trucks when it was an active base.

“My heart is just broken,” Cole said. “It’s so close to home. It’s very, very upsetting.”

There’s Asbestos In Debris From Tustin’s Burning Hangar
Public Agencies Fail to Inform In Early Hours

https://voiceofoc.org/2023/11/santana-theres-asbestos-in-the-debris-from-tustins-burning-hangar/

Firefighters battling blaze on massive north hangar at Tustin Air Base
https://www.ocregister.com/2023/11/07/former-tustin-air-base-hangars-on-fire/

How little Placentia broke a fire powerhouse’s back
Column: The results of this ‘dangerous’ experiment are in, and may be the old guard’s worst nightmare
https://www.ocregister.com/2023/10/29/how-little-placentia-broke-a-fire-powerhouses-back/

Navy sued for $65 million over Tustin hangar roof collapse
https://www.ocregister.com/2015/03/12/navy-sued-for-65-million-over-tustin-hangar-roof-collapse/

A magnet for trespassers, a neglected Navy blimp hangar becomes Tustin’s headache
https://www.ocregister.com/2019/09/27/a-magnet-for-trespassers-a-neglected-navy-blimp-hangar-becomes-tustins-headache/

Inhaling the Dangers of Burning Pressure Treated Wood
https://woodbeaver.net/inhaling-the-dangers-of-burning-pressure-treated-wood

Raise Your Hand – if You Want to Live or Work On Top of a Toxic Waste Dump
https://savetustin.com/2012/05/the-45-million-dollar-road-to-nowhere/

“The “Greed” and “Crocodile Tears” at Corrupt City Hall and from Corrupt Developers was “Unstoppable” and now People and Kids are “Exposed” to the Toxic Horrors – This could be Tustin’s Toxic 9/11 – there could be a mass human exodus from that land – abandoned homes – schools – businesses – never ending lawsuits and Toxic cleanup – remember there’s another Hangar too!”

If the “Pickpockets and Water Pimps” at “Tustin California” City Hall – have “their” Way – “Again” – Your Water Bill is Gonna Look More Like a “Car Payment” – It’s Never Ending and “You and I have just Begun the Water Fight of Our Lives”

Water

Dear Friend – Neighbor – and Tustin California Water Customer,

“Pretty soon your Water Bill is Gonna Look Like a Car Payment!”

Yes you can send in a protest letter and attend the Public Hearing on Water Rate Increases  but here’s a Reality Check – the City of Tustin Does Not Want to Hear from You – and Does Not Care what You think about this Water Rate Increase.

They’re Increasing Water Rates whether You Like it or Not!

So why the Public Hearing? Well – that’s the only way that the City of Tustin Water Works can Legally Pick-Your-Pocket with this Rate Increase.

During a Drought the City and other Water Departments will Tell You to “Cut Back” on your water usage – because like talking about “Climate Change” – it’s “Politically Correct” – but the “Reality” is that they want you to use as much water as possible – so they can support their “Lavish Salaries” – “Luxurious Benefits” and “Sweetheart Retirement Packages” – “things that “you” won’t get.”

Go ahead and send in your Letter of Protest – and watch the City Clerk Open Your Letter – Roll their Eyes – “Laugh” – and promptly throw it over to a Corner of their desk – or maybe in the trash can – a successful protest requires 51% of water customers to mail a formal protest and for it to be counted as valid.

I don’t have lots of Time to Fight this for “You” – so – You need to “Fight for Yourself”.

There are only a few ways you can negate and Stop this Water Rate Increase.

First and the “easiest” is to conduct a thorough Water use Audit at Your Home or Business – and make a Plan to Cut Your Water Use by at least Half – and even more if possible.

Second and won’t be as easy – is to use a Law Firm to fight and eliminate the Fixed Meter Charge – “around $24.00 a month residential “now” – even if you never use a single drop of water” – this”Penalizes Water Savers” and may be patently “Illegal”.

You can fight this Now – or – you can wait until your Water Bill is $1,000.00 a month – and you and your Family can’t afford to Bathe – because that’s where the Pickpockets are Going with Water!

That’s why I have copied this letter to the Governor of California and other State of California and County of Orange Officials.

You and I have just begun the “Water Fight of Our Lives” and we need to beckon the State of California to “Step In and Take Over City of Tustin Water” and “Stop the Mismanagement and Pimping” of our “Life and Health Sustaining Water Resources”.

This is a Game of “Water Chicken” – that must be Stopped – “Right Now” – You and I Cut Back on Our Water Usage – the City and Water Departments then Raise Rates Again – Cut and Raise – Cut and Raise – and Cut and Raise – when “Finally” You and I reach a “Cut Back Dead End” – where we can “No Longer Cut Back on Our Water Usage” – there’s nowhere left to Cut – without Sacrificing Our Health and Safety – and the Health and Safety of Our Families and Children.

Talking Points and Issues

1. Instead of spending millions building a filtering system for the “polluted wells” – “Water Employee Job Security” – we should just close the wells and buy all water from Colorado River Sources – as is occurring now – closing the Wells and eliminating employees and other expenses will go a long way towards a “Water Rate Reduction”.

2. The Fixed Meter Charge – “around $24.00 a month residential “now” – even if you never use a single drop of water” – “Penalizes Water Savers” and may be patently “Illegal”.

3. We need to hire a Law Firm and “Force” an independent Audit of both the Water Department and City Hall – looking for expenses and people we can “Cut” – and Possibly effect a “Water Rate “Reduction” not Increase.

4. City Hall and Water Employees “Pickpockets and Water Pimps” – live in a “Perpetual Pay Raises” – “Lavish Benefits” – and “Lush Retirement Packages” – “La La Land” – while the rest of us suffer with never ending and outrageous expense increases.

5. Our first line of defense against the “Pickpockets and Water Pimps” is to Immediately audit your household and business water usage – with the goal of reducing your consumption by – fully 50% – as I mentioned – “the System is Rigged” and the Fixed Meter Charge of around $24.00 a month residential “Penalizes Water Savers” – so we must pursue a Legal Remedy to eliminate the Fixed Meter Charge – altogether – this Way Water Savers – Save – and Water Users – Pay.

Best regards, good luck and good health to everybody,

Dave – Tustin Water Customer

CITY OF TUSTIN WATER PROPOSED RATE INCREASE
https://www.tustinca.org/242/Water-Rates

Recent Actual Tustin California Water Bill

2 Month Water Bill Dated 9/11/2023

Water: Water Consumption Consumption 40 Units $129.60
Fixed Meter Charge 5/8″ $46.03
Total Charges: **** $175.63

New Rates Applied to Same Usage Beginning in 2024

Water: Water Consumption Consumption 40 Units $142.80
Fixed Meter Charge 5/8″ $49.73
Total Charges: *****$192.53

New Rates Applied to Same Usage Beginning in 2025

Water: Water Consumption Consumption 40 Units $156.00
Fixed Meter Charge 5/8″ $54.21
Total Charges: *****$210.21

New Rates Applied to Same Usage Beginning in 2026

Water: Water Consumption Consumption 40 Units $170.40
Fixed Meter Charge 5/8″ $59.09
Total Charges: *****$229.49

New Rates Applied to Same Usage Beginning in 2027

Water: Water Consumption Consumption 40 Units $186.00
Fixed Meter Charge 5/8″ $64.41
Total Charges: *****$250.41

New Rates Applied to Same Usage Beginning in 2028

Water: Water Consumption Consumption 40 Units $202.80
Fixed Meter Charge 5/8″ $70.21
Total Charges: *****$273.01

These New Water Rates represent – a $50.00 “per month” Water Rate “Increase”  by 2028 – but – Way – Way – More – than that – if You have a Large Family – or – Operate a Business.

And – It’s Never Ending!

Here’s the last Tustin Water Rate Increase – other Water Companies were Sued and the Tiered Rate System was deemed Illegal.

https://savetustin.com/tag/water/

Rates just went up by 5% each year – already!

As of February 1, 2020, the City of Tustin moved to a fixed-rate fee system from a tiered-rate system. This means all customers will be charged the same flat fee of $2.79 for each unit of water (748 gallons) used regardless of how much water is consumed. Since 2014, Tustin’s unit cost has ranged from $0.84 to $4.05 per unit depending on amount of usage (i.e. tiered system). On each January 1 over the next four years (2021-2024), the new unit cost of $2.79 will increase by 5 percent as part of this five-year rate plan.

https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/3441/Water-Rates—FAQ-041520

Trivia:

In 1958 the Privately Owned Tustin Water Works Installed No Residential Water Meters – and Households Paid a Flat Total Fee for Water Use of just $5.00 per month.

TO PROTEST WATER RATE INCREASES:

Get involved!

Attend a public meeting December 5th, 2023 7 PM – Tustin California City Council Chamber about the water rate adjustment to hear from the City about the proposed water rates and why the increase is needed.
Call the hotline for more information at (714) 573-3099
Email Customer Service on Water Rates [email protected]

Attend the Public Hearing and or:

Address your letter as follows and Postmark Prior to Public Hearing December 5th, 2023 7 PM – Tustin California City Council Chamber.

“I Protest any and All Proposed Water Rate Increases”

In California, Proposition 218 allows customers to comment on the proposed water rates prior to or during a public hearing. Consistent with the provisions of Proposition 218, and California Government Code § 53755, this notice has been mailed to all customers whose names and addresses appear in the current customer database of the City of Tustin and property owners within the service area based on the most current information published by the Orange County Assessor. If you object to the proposed fees as described in this Notice, you may file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the close of the
public hearing.

Written protests can be mailed or personally delivered to:

City of Tustin – City Clerk’s Office
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92780-3767

A valid protest must include all of the following information:

1. Customer name and account number or name of property owner;
2. Service address;
3. Assessor parcel number;
4. A statement of protest (“I protest” will suffice); and
5. The original signature of the protesting customer/property owner (photocopies will not be accepted).
The City Clerk will accept only one protest per parcel served by Tustin Water. The City Clerk will determine the validity of all protests submitted and exclude any invalid protests from the final tabulation.
The City Clerk may confer with the City Attorney in determining the validity of written protests. As part of this process, the City Attorney may review contested or suspect protest forms. The City Clerk’s decisions shall be final and binding. In the preliminary determination of validity, the City Clerk will disregard as invalid all protests in the following categories:

1. The purported protest is a photocopy and does not contain an original authorized signature;and/or
2. The purported protest does not identify the customer/property owner by name; and/or
3. The customer/property owner has not signed the purported protest; and/or
4. The purported protest does not have an identifiable statement of protest; and/or
5. The purported protest is one of multiple protests returned for a single service address; and/or
6. The purported protest’s appearance or method of delivery reflects any other circumstances which reasonably demonstrate that the protest has been tampered with or is otherwise invalid.
7. The purported protest is received later than close of the public hearing on December 5th 2023 7 PM
For questions regarding this Notice or protest procedures, contact the City Clerk’s Office at (714) 573-3000

If you or your Law Firm has received this message and is interested in representing Tustin California Water Ratepayers – a Retainer Payment of $5000.00 may be available – immediately – inquire.

If you received this message and aren’t sure if your neighbor or other Tustin Water Customer did – Please Share the Love – and Forward this Message as You See Fit.

“Doing nothing is always “easier” – but – doing “something” – is better!”

How to challenge an unfair water rate increase:

https://savetustin.com/blogfiles/WaterRatesProp218_Eng.pdf

GET PAID TO REMOVE YOUR LAWNS AND SAVE BIG ON WATER!

The Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC), the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, and your local water agency are proud to offer the Turf Removal Program to qualifying residents and businesses across Orange County.

Use 50-70% less water outdoors by replacing thirsty turf grass with beautiful, climate-appropriate landscape!

Rebates start at $3 per square foot of turf grass removed – the savings really adds up!
Get paid to transform your landscape and upgrade your outdated irrigation system.

FREE customized *Design Assistance and **Maintenance programs also available to Turf Removal Program participants!

Save water, save money, and save time on maintenance!
Attractive landscaping increases property values by 6-13%!
Rebates are limited. Apply today to take advantage of these significant benefits and more!
Artificial or Synthetic Turf is not eligible for a rebate.

Please do not remove your grass until your application is approved. Projects that are underway or already completed prior to the receipt of the “Notice to Proceed” email are not eligible to participate.

For questions about the program, please call (714) 593-5036 or email [email protected].

https://www.mwdoc.com/save-water/rebates/residential-rebates/turf-removal/

Remember you can also protest Water Rate Increases by Buying Your Next Car – TV – Refrigerator and Other Larger Purchases – Inside a City – that is “Outside” the City of Tustin California!

If you operate a Business in Tustin California – You already Know – that these could be the Water Rate Increases – that – Put-You-“Out”-of-Business!

We Love You Howard Jarvis – RIP – and Thank You for Everything!

After years of work by tax revolt leaders Howard and Estelle Jarvis, Proposition 13 was overwhelmingly approved by voters on June 6, 1978. But Howard and Estelle knew that taxpayers’ gains would be temporary without a permanent citizens organization to protect Proposition 13 and to continue the movement against higher taxes. To meet this need, they founded the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (originally called the California Tax Reduction Movement).

Although Howard Jarvis passed away in 1986 and his wife Estelle in 2006, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association continues their important work.

And with the constant pressure from government for higher taxes, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association’s role as the legal and political watchdog of Proposition 13 is more important than ever.

https://www.hjta.org/about-hjta/the-history-of-hjta/

Comment

Well it looks like the former Mayor of Anaheim won’t be needing his Million and a Half Dollar Big Yellow Helicopter he keeps at Chino Airport anymore – unless of course he’s planning on Using it to Escape from Prison — Former Anaheim Mayor Harry Sidhu has agreed to plead guilty to four federal charges, capping a years-long federal investigation into alleged corruption that led to his resignation and torpedoed the city’s $320 million sale of Angel Stadium.

Former Anaheim Mayor Harry Sidhu has agreed to plead guilty to four federal charges, capping a years-long federal investigation into alleged corruption that led to his resignation and torpedoed the city’s $320 million sale of Angel Stadium.

In a deal announced Wednesday, Aug. 16, Sidhu will plead guilty to obstruction of justice, wire fraud, false statement to the Federal Aviation Administration and false statement to the FBI.

“Mr. Sidhu was elected by and pledged to work for the residents of Anaheim, but he violated that pledge and their trust on numerous occasions to look out for special interests,” Donald Alway, the FBI’s assistant director in charge of the Los Angeles field office, said in a statement. “Mr. Sidhu deceived his colleagues and weakened the city’s official strategy by divulging intellectual property, then lied to the government when his corruption was discovered.”

In a statement Wednesday, Sidhu’s attorney Paul S. Meyer said, “Former Mayor Sidhu appreciates the thorough and fair investigation by the United States Attorney’s Office leading to a resolution in this matter.”

The total maximum sentence for all the offenses for which Sidhu has agreed to plea to is up to 50 years in prison, according to the agreement. He will next need to enter his plea in court and his actual sentencing is up to a judge at a later date and could be significantly shorter.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office agreed that if the court imposes a prison term of no less than 30 months, it would waive its right to appeal the sentence.

The agreement comes two weeks after an independent city-commissioned investigation was released providing new details for how Sidhu and allies appear to have gone unchecked in City Hall dealings.

During the city’s negotiations to sell Angel Stadium to team owner Arte Moreno’s business partnership, Sidhu sought to become a member of the city’s negotiating team and then provided “confidential inside information belonging to the city” to former Anaheim Chamber of Commerce CEO Todd Ament and to a consultant working for the Angels, “so that the Angels could buy Angel Stadium on terms beneficial to the Angels,” according to the plea agreement.

In 2019, Sidhu had also provided a confidential appraisal range related to Angel Stadium to Ament to give to the Angels before that figure was public, according to the plea agreement.

Sidhu was secretly recorded several months later saying he expected to ask for a $1 million campaign contribution toward his reelection from the Angels if they succeeded in buying the stadium, the plea agreement says. In an interview with FBI agents on May 12, 2022, days before the FBI’s investigation became public, Sidhu lied to the agents about expecting “nothing” from the Angels after the stadium deal closed, according to the plea agreement. Prosecutors also said Sidhu “falsely” told investigators that he did not recall providing stadium sale information during the negotiations.

Sidhu resigned in May 2022 following the revelation that the FBI was investigating the former mayor and the $320 million stadium deal was scuttled by the City Council.

Angels Organization spokesperson Marie Garvey said, “It is important to note both the plea agreement along with the city’s investigation showed no evidence of any wrongdoing by the Angels Organization.”

Ament’s attorneys, Joshua Robbins and Andrew Selesnick of Buchalter law firm, declined to comment through a spokesperson.

The FBI’s investigation was underway since at least 2019, according to an affidavit filed last year in support of a request for search warrants that included information investigators said was gleaned from wiretaps and intercepted emails.

The plea agreement gives details about how Sidhu attempted to not pay California sales tax for a used helicopter he purchased for $205,000. He had registered the helicopter using a mailing address in Scottsdale, Arizona, to avoid paying $15,887 in taxes. The helicopter was stored in Chino.

Sidhu has already paid back the taxes, according to the plea agreement.

He also provided false information to the FAA when he submitted the Arizona mailing address as his own, the agreement says. The mailing address belonged to an unnamed Anaheim businessperson.

Sidhu and his attorneys signed the plea agreement on Monday, Aug. 14.

For the obstruction of justice charge, Sidhu would admit that he destroyed multiple email messages and documents “with the intent to impede the FBI’s investigation of public corruption surrounding the city’s potential sale of Angel Stadium,” according to the plea agreement.

One of the emails deleted was related to the Angel Stadium deal, which had “confidential negotiation information,” including issues around the price and terms, the plea agreement says.

The document, drafted by attorneys for the city,  included a section about parking and how it affected the value of land, the agreement says, and gave the example of how the team could “eliminate the requirement that they maintain at least 12,500 parking spaces so upon closing they could immediately amend the lease to limit their parking obligation and then flip the land for millions more than they paid for it.”

“Reducing their parking obligation by 4,000 spaces would translate to $64 million in increased land value,” according to the document referenced in the plea agreement.

Prosecutors said Sidhu told investigators he did not conduct city business using his personal email.

Also in the plea agreement are details about planning for mock council meeting sessions in advance of the council’s vote on the Angel Stadium sale.

Sidhu had deleted an email about the sessions that used personal addresses for him, two other unnamed council members and other city staff, the agreement says. Sidhu would purposely conduct city business using his personal email and communicate with some city staff’s personal email addresses as well, prosecutors said.

The deleted email, according to the agreement, said the prep sessions would include the then-mayor pro tem, another council member, the city’s chief communications officer, another city staffer, the unnamed Angels consultant, Ament, the president of the Angels and an attorney for the Angels.

The practice meeting would be held in three sessions, according to the agreement’s description, during which participants would debate the strengths, pitfalls and vulnerabilities of the stadium deal. The Angels team would develop what the agreement called “zingers,” responses and other points to improve the participants’ performance.

It appeared the mock meetings were intended be a dress rehearsal for the real one.

In strongly worded comments Wednesday, Mayor Ashleigh Aitken said she was appalled by the alleged collusion between Sidhu, former council members and the Angels organization.

“If the allegations surrounding the Angels organization setting up a shadow council meeting are true, I don’t think the negotiations were in good faith and I would like to look into that,” Aitken said.

The Angels were supposed to be at arm’s length during the negotiations, Aitken said, and any future talks would have to be more transparent and with more community participation.

Overall, Aitken said Sidhu’s plea agreement unveiled just the “tip of the iceberg” of the problems with the city and further confirmed the need for reform.

She said the city also needs stronger restrictions and better enforcement to harness campaign financing and lobbyists who have run unfettered at City Hall.

“We need to make sure our policies are in line with other cities our size,” said Aitken.

In a city statement late Wednesday, a city spokesman said, “We are aware of and are reviewing the plea agreement, which reflects what was a challenging time for Anaheim. We look forward to our City Council’s ongoing consideration of reforms to protect our city and keep moving forward.”

According to the plea agreement, the two unnamed council members were assigned specifically to attack then-Councilman Jose Moreno, a strong critic of the stadium deal.

Moreno, who served from 2016 to 2022, said the new details in the plea agreement affirm what he felt at the time was a scripted strategy surrounding the Angel Stadium discussions.

“This is really tragic and unfortunate but not surprising,” Moreno said, “that high levels of our city staff were involved in these meetings and played with the trust of the people of Anaheim.”

Hangar Fire - "Without Litigation" - City of Tustin Already On the Hook for $90 Million in Clean-Up Costs - "Not Including the Actual Hangar Property" - and Heading for a Billion Dollars - Developers Likely Not Off the Hook Either - Property Value Assessments Undergoing Official Review - Ask Yourself - Would You Buy or Rent at the Tustin Legacy - Remember there's "Another" Hangar Too
Addicted? 1-800-662-HELP
URGENT REMINDER - if You're on Southern California Edison's - "Time to Fuck You" - "Electricity Rate Plan" - "Opt Out Now" - Call Today or Visit the Website - 1-800-810-2369