Almost Immediately the City of Tustin Began Selling Off their “Free Toxic Hangar Land” to Developers – Who In Turn – Sold it Off as Apartment Homes – Offices – Shopping Centers – Medical Buildings and to “Home Builders” and then – to “You” – But Now – Your Dream Home Property Value “Just Got Reduced to “Junk” Status” – Where Did All that Money Go? Orange County Assessor: Tustin Fire Could Tank Property Values.

Orange County Assessor: Tustin Fire Could Tank Property Values

BY NOAH BIESIADA

Tustin homeowners could see a drop in their property taxes after an old air base hangar burned to the ground, showering the surrounding area in ash and debris containing asbestos.

“This is a disaster,” said County Assessor Claude Parrish in an interview. “You think anyone’s going to want to buy your home right now? No, it’s economic damage.”

“The damage could be for years,” he continued. “Who wants to buy something when you’re near that?”

Now, the county tax assessor is sending out over 23,000 notices to homeowners surrounding the ruins of the hangar, notifying them that they need to submit applications if they want their property values reassessed due to any damage to their homes.

Parrish, who lives near the hangar, said he tried to avoid going home during the fire because he could see the asbestos showering over his house.

“I’ve had flakes as big as a half an inch square,” Parrish said. “We had to put up with that for days.”

It’s unclear just how many homes could see an adjustment, with the letters noting the assessor will “make value adjustments as appropriate,” and stating that any property that suffered over $10,000 in damage “may be eligible for a temporary value adjustment.”

Property taxes are one of the pillars that fund cities and local school boards, meaning any adjustment could see a dip in funding for the agencies that rely on them.

For example, property taxes contributed roughly $23 million to Tustin’s overall $84 million general fund budget during its last fiscal year.

However, Parrish noted it was too early to make any determination on what the impact would be to local tax collection.

Tustin Mayor Austin Lumbard criticized the roll out of the notices, saying the assessor’s office didn’t send any messages to the city and he found out about the issue when it showed up in his own mailbox.

“The assessor sending something out about property damage without coordinating with anyone … could potentially lead to unnecessary alarm for other residents,” Lumbard said in a Monday interview. “Getting a letter like this is not helpful.”

Parrish said he isn’t required to work with any local agencies, and that he’s required by law to run tests like this after a major fire.

“There’s a loss in value definitely, the question is how much,” Parrish said. “We’re going to do a survey and find out how much.”

The Future of the Hangars

The final pieces of the hangar came down last Thursday, when demolition crews knocked down the doors that have stood since the 1940s – the last piece of the hangar that was still standing following the fire.

The future of the land is also up in the air, after Tustin leaders shot down plans from the county government to turn the spot into a regional park because they took too long to develop it.

The south hangar, which was unaffected by the blaze that burned down the hangar to the north, is also still waiting on future plans, but the site is too expensive for most people to use according to Lumbard.

“I probably get a call every week with someone who has an idea for it,” Lumbard said. “When we get to the point of actually engaging with these folks and explain the challenges, how there’s no active utilities, the challenges of cost and upkeep, they often back away.”

The city has already budgeted $8 million to try and get the hangar to the point that it can operate, and occasionally hosts events there, but right now it’s still costing the city money every year.

“We’re interested in talking with the right folks,” Lumbard said. “But it’s going to take someone with serious financing to come in.”

Noah Biesiada is a Voice of OC reporter and corps member with Report for America, a GroundTruth initiative. Contact him at [email protected] or on Twitter @NBiesiada.

CAL AMSTERDAM – Smoking marijuana may be more harmful to lungs than smoking cigarettes, study finds

Addicted? 1-800-662-HELP

As recreational pot has gained traction in states all across the country, more research has been focusing on its health effects. One argument marijuana supporters have stood by for years – that weed is healthier than cigarettes – is now coming under fire.

A new study has found that smoking marijuana may be more likely to cause certain health problems than tobacco.

“Perhaps it’s time to just pause and think about what you’re doing to yourself until we get more information,” said Dr. Scott Brandman, a thoracic radiologist, in reference to the new study published in the Radiological Society of North America.

That study reviewed lung scans of smokers and found that rates of emphysema, airway inflammation and enlarged breast tissue were higher in marijuana smokers than tobacco smokers. Emphysema is already the third leading cause of death in America.

“Marijuana smoke not only damages the airways in the lung… but it’s actually making holes in it,” Brandman explained. “We’re seeing for the first time these holes being created in the lung. That is going to be irreversible damage for these people.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention say about 20% of all Americans have tried pot. It’s also the most commonly used drug in America that is still illegal at the federal level.

Brandman says one factor that may affect weed smokers is how they inhale: deeper, holding the smoke in their lungs longer.

“It’s going deeper into the lung and its having an opportunity to stay there for a longer time during that deeper, longer breath hold,” he said.

And researchers are also looking at something within pot.

“There’s a carcinogen or chemical that we haven’t yet identified in marijuana smoke, that we’re theorizing is damaging the lung and creating these holes,” Brandman added.

If you’re using marijuana for medical reasons, Brandman suggests talking to your doctor about edibles or ways other than smoking to use marijuana.

Some health effects of marijuana, such as brain development issues, high blood pressure, and increased risk of heart attacks and strokes, have been studied. However, according to Dr. Albert Rizzo, lung doctor and chief medical officer of the American Lung Association, “We don’t know the long-term effects of marijuana as we do for the long-term effects of tobacco.”

Tobacco smoke is also filtered, but marijuana smoke is not. All of these factors contribute to inflammation and irreversible damage, doctors say.

“Anything you inhale that could irritate the lungs would not be advisable, so I would recommend they stop,” Rizzo said. However, he recognizes that some users have medical necessity.

“There is a public perception that marijuana is safe. This study signals that marijuana could be more harmful than people realize,” said Dr. Giselle Revah, study co-author and cardiothoracic radiologist.

https://abc7.com/marijuana-smoke-lungs-study-cigarette/12457031/

CAL AMSTERDAM – North Dakota Rejects Bill To Legalize Adult-Use Cannabis


Voters reject Statutory Measure 2, which would have legalized cannabis for adults in North Dakota.

Addicted? 1-800-662-HELP

Voters Tuesday rejected Statutory Measure 2, which would have created a new chapter of the North Dakota Century Code legalizing the production, processing, and sale of cannabis. It would have also legalized the possession and use of various forms of cannabis by anyone 21 years of age or older.

Statutory Measure 2 was one of only two voter initiatives on the ballot in North Dakota. The other bill, Statutory Measure 1, would have implemented term limits for the governor and legislators.

It would have also tasked the state health department with setting up industry regulations by Oct. 1, 2023, and cap the number of cultivation facilities at seven and the number of retail dispensaries at no more than 18. Other details like taxation would be left to the state’s Legislature.

Under the bill, adults 21 and older would have been able to purchase and possess up to one ounce of cannabis, four grams of concentrate and flower produced from up to three plants grown at home for personal use.

The bill would have allowed for only a maximum of seven cultivation facilities and 18 cannabis retailers.

North Dakotans rejected an adult-use cannabis legalization measure also in 2018 by a vote of nearly 60%.

The measure was heavily based on language from a legislative cannabis proposal, House Bill 1420, which was approved by the North Dakota House of Representatives in 2021.

Last July, New Approach ND turned in enough signatures for the legalization measure to qualify, and Secretary of State Al Jaeger certified the initiative the next month.

North Dakota voted against legalization in the 2018 midterm elections, and the legislation ended up with the same fate this year.

https://hightimes.com/news/north-dakota-rejects-bill-to-legalize-adult-use-cannabis/

Hangar Fire - "Without Litigation" - City of Tustin Already On the Hook for $90 Million in Clean-Up Costs - "Not Including the Actual Hangar Property" - and Heading for a Billion Dollars - Developers Likely Not Off the Hook Either - Property Value Assessments Undergoing Official Review - Ask Yourself - Would You Buy or Rent at the Tustin Legacy - Remember there's "Another" Hangar Too
Addicted? 1-800-662-HELP
URGENT REMINDER - if You're on Southern California Edison's - "Time to Fuck You" - "Electricity Rate Plan" - "Opt Out Now" - Call Today or Visit the Website - 1-800-810-2369