The Real Drug Dealers “City Hall ” Don’t Like It when You Don’t Pay Up! – Licensed cannabis businesses in Santa Ana, Los Angeles raided over unpaid taxes – Is it an industry-wide crackdown? If so, some say the timing couldn’t be worse.

April 1, 2022

By BROOKE STAGGS | [email protected] | Orange County Register

Two California Highway Patrol vehicles and a half dozen unmarked vehicles blocked off the parking lot of Super Clinik, a licensed cannabis store in Santa Ana, just after the shop opened at 8 a.m. on the morning of March 18.

With an agent from the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration looking on, several CHP officers went inside, counted out a couple six-inch high stacks of cash and took them from the Birch Street store, according to witness reports and photos from the scene.

Super Clinik owners didn’t respond to multiple requests to speak for this story, while state tax officials said privacy laws prevent them from discussing specific cases. But experts said the operation at the Santa Ana shop had all the hallmarks of a “till tap” civil warrant, which the tax agency uses to seize cash from businesses that haven’t paid sales tax bills despite escalated warnings.

This is the second such operation reported at a longstanding, licensed cannabis shop in Southern California in the past month. In early March, a shop called TLC in Boyle Heights, owned by the well-known industry veterans Jungle Boys, also got raided by the CDTFA and CHP. The business posted video from the incident on its Instagram page, saying officers came in with guns drawn and took more than $100,000 from their cash registers after they paid $18 million in taxes in 2021.

“That’s triggering to all of us because this is what used to happen regularly,” said Dana Cisneros, an attorney who’s worked with cannabis businesses for 15 years.

For decades, law enforcement raided pot shops in California, arresting people on site and seizing goods as businesses operated in the gray space created by loose medical marijuana laws. But with recreational consumption of cannabis legal in California since 2016, and the state giving members of the fledgling industry some leeway, raids of licensed shops have been rare in recent years.

Now, the recent reports of tax raids have industry insiders wondering if state authorities are entering a tougher phase of enforcement when it comes to dealing with licensed operators.

Such an escalation was inevitable on the one hand, as the industry matured. But there’s also evidence that even as most cannabis businesses are paying their tax bills on time, the industry is a bit less likely than others to do so.

The state reports that 99% of all businesses in California pay their sales tax on time each quarter, but the pay-on-time rate for the cannabis industry is about 90%. And with nearly $309 million in tax revenue collected from cannabis businesses in the final quarter of 2021, and nearly $3.5 billion raised since taxes took effect in January 2018, that default rate means cannabis businesses owed the state more than $11 million in past-due taxes at the end of last year.

Add to that another factor — some licensed cannabis operators continue to do work in the unlicensed side of the industry.

Rob Taft, owner of 420 Central in Santa Ana, said he’s long predicted that California and other governments would eventually use tax enforcement to target potential bad actors in the cannabis industry, the way gangster Al Capone was ultimately brought down for tax evasion. In that case, rather than giving businesses leeway, Taft and others suggest the state might have been giving cannabis operators just enough rope to hang themselves.

“We’ve pretty much pounded into (our clients) that the scariest boogeyman in the scope of enforcement is the tax man,” said Hilary Bricken, a cannabis industry attorney in Los Angeles.

Taft and others in the industry said they don’t support anyone not paying their taxes. But they also say there couldn’t be a worse time for the state to start targeting licensed businesses in such a forceful way.

Just 26% of California’s cannabis businesses are turning a profit, according to a January report from the Portland-based data firm Whitney Economics. That’s well below the national average of 42%. Among the 17% of operators who are only breaking even, and the 56% who are losing money, some anecdotally are talking about either leaving California or going back to the illicit market where many of them got their start.

“They’re choking us out,” Taft said.

Where is the protection?

One problem is the persistent existence of the underground cannabis market. It’s tough for licensed operators to start up in California, while it’s not hard for illegal operators to stay in business. As a result, most experts believe the underground cannabis market is about twice as big as the licensed business in California.

That makes tax raids on licensed businesses — by state officials who, in theory, could be stamping out illegal operators — particularly frustrating, Cisneros said.

“I’m not saying anybody should not pay their taxes,” she said. “But where’s the enforcement to protect people who are complying with the law, or at least trying?”

The state’s Department of Cannabis Control has been reluctant in the early years of legalization to make aggressive moves even against unlicensed cannabis businesses. Leaders said they wanted to use a “carrot” rather than a “stick” approach in hopes of getting more illicit operators to move into the regulated market.

While some licensed operators have been frustrated with that approach, Bricken said she’s concerned about the chilling effect that aggressive CDTFA raids will have on efforts to convert more businesses.

“People in the illegal market will see this and it’s another reason to say, ‘Why would I ever transition?’”

The second main factor that licensed businesses say is throttling the industry is the same thing sparking the recent raids: taxes.

Sellers have been raising flags about a need for relief from industry taxes that can easily hit rates of 45%, driving up the cost consumers pay for safe, regulated products and creating a window for unlicensed operators to grab market share. In Sacramento, some lawmakers are pushing to ease cannabis taxes, but most in the industry aren’t confident that they’ll pass.

So in recent months some licensed operators have threatened to withhold their tax payments from the state and put that money into escrow accounts as a way to prove a point. But there’s no evidence that any licensed businesses have followed through on that threat, or that either of the recent CDTFA’s raids had any connection to such an effort.

In the case of Jungle Boys, the company reports it’s been appealing $60,000 in penalties and interest that CDTFA says it owes on a $130,000 tax bill. While that appeal was still pending, the company says the agency came and collected more than what they reportedly owed.

“CDTFA is coming out swinging,” Bricken said. “And they’re the perfect agency to do it because they’re nearly untouchable.”

When asked about till tap operations, agency spokeswoman Tamma Adamek pointed to a document that explains such civil warrants (which typically are executed with help from either the CHP or local police) are issued only after verbal and written collection requests have proven unsuccessful.

The policy states that CDTFA also can collect funds beyond the overdue tax fees to cover the cost of executing the till tap.

That’s why Bricken said she always advises her clients to pay whatever taxes the state says they owe up front, and then appeal to get back any funds that are rightfully theirs.

When businesses get upside down with CDTFA, she said she expects the agency will share that information with the IRS, which can invite federal attention. Reports of raids also can harm relationships with customers, vendors and financers, who already are hard to come by in an industry that’s still considered high risk.

“They are looking to make examples of people,” Bricken said. “And the bigger the target, the more influential the message.”

The CDTFA is not specifically targeting cannabis businesses, Adamek said. But till taps, she explained, do work best with cash-heavy businesses such as bars, gas stations and cannabis stores. While other industries are cash-heavy for different reasons, cannabis operators rely on cash because their product is illegal under federal law and they can struggle to get access to federally-regulated banks.

Rather than risk such drastic action by refusing to pay tax bills, Taft said he’s encouraging licensed businesses to be “good operators” and to protest California’s high cannabis taxes by joining organized efforts to bring rates down. He’s part of a group of licensed business owners that recently filed a petition, for example, asking Santa Ana to lower its local cannabis tax from 8% to 4%.

Recall, funded by Santa Ana police union, moves forward against councilwoman – Police Officers Association has paid $220,000 to remove Cecilia Iglesias, who voted against police pay raise. “City Hall is being managed by third-party interests.”

A recall effort funded by the Santa Ana police union against a council member who voted against police pay raises is moving forward.

Santa Ana Councilwoman Cecilia Iglesias (Courtesy of the city of Santa Ana)
The recall drive against Councilwoman Cecilia Iglesias, which garnered more than 16,000 signatures, was submitted to the city on Dec. 18 and delivered the following day to the Orange County Registrar of Voters. The Registrar’s office has until Feb. 3 to verify the signatures and return those results to the city.

To qualify for a ballot, the recall bid will need to have at least 10,865 valid signatures, Registrar Neal Kelley wrote in an e-mail.

Meanwhile, a separate recall drive against Santa Ana Councilman Juan Villegas, who also voted against police pay raises, appears to have stalled or stopped. In recent months, paid signature gatherers who earlier this year were urging Santa Ana residents to approve both recall efforts, have focused solely on Iglesias.

The councilwoman said Monday that recall is political payback for her vote earlier this year against the police contract and its new pay raises.

“This tells you: ‘Who has the money has the power,’” Iglesias said.

“City Hall is being managed by third-party interests.”

The Santa Ana police union is funding the drives against the council members, according to campaign disclosure statements filed with the City Clerk’s office. The Police Officers Association has spent $220,000 since last July to oppose Iglesias, most of it going to a committee dubbed “Neighbors Supporting the Recall of Cecilia Iglesias.” The union has given another $100,000 to “Neighbors Supporting the Recall of Juan Villegas.”

Gerry Serrano, the union’s president, wrote in an email that the POA is supporting Iglesias’ recall because “her behavior while in office has been unethical, unprofessional and criminal.”

“She has slandered the police officers association. She has illegally interfered in personnel matters and does not support public safety; she voted no on the city budget and the police budget. (The) illegal behavior must not go unchecked.”

Iglesias has openly criticized Serrano. Her hashtag for him on Facebook is “#greedygerry.”

“Gerry has taken a personal stand on me because I’ve called him out. And he doesn’t like it. He’s never been called out,” Iglesias said Monday.

Serrano wrote in e-mails to the Register that Iglesias has slandered, libeled and defamed him and the union, and insisted that such conduct “is criminal.”

The POA and Serrano made similar complaints to the council on June 28, when an attorney for the union asked city officials to investigate Iglesias for city ethics and code violations.

“Councilmember Iglesias has used language that is the opposite of civil and courteous such as calling Sergeant Serrano a bully and corrupt, and that implies improper action on his part to act for personal gain,” attorney Charles Goldwasser of Sherman Oaks wrote in the letter to Mayor Miguel Pulido and the city council.

No city action has been taken, Serrano said Monday.

Iglesias voted against the city and police budget because she said she did not support $25 million in police pay raises, which included retroactive increases and extra money for long-time officers. It is not illegal to vote against the budget.

In August, when asked about allegations that the union is behind the recalls, Serrano told the Register: “we are evaluating this as it progresses.” But by the date of that email, Aug. 6, the union had done more than evaluate. The union had spent a total of $50,000 against Iglesias and Villegas, according to records filed with the city.

“It’s a waste of everybody’s time but Gerry wants to prove a point,” Iglesias said.

Both Iglesias and Villegas voted in February against spending $25 million for police pay raises. The raises are being funded by Measure X, a sales tax approved by Santa Ana voters in 2018 that is expected to generate some $60 million annually.

That 1.5 % tax – which makes Santa Ana’s 9.25 % sales tax the highest in Orange County – was supposed to fund a number of city services, including police. But a citizens’ committee tracking the money said recently that most of that tax is being spent on police expenses and other city debt.

Meanwhile, the police department recently announced that it hired 50 new officers this year, “something that has not occurred (in Santa Ana) in over 20 years.”

Iglesias and Villegas both said they support police officers but want to see fiscal responsibility. Both said the police union is out of line with the recalls.

“It’s unfortunate that police officer dues are being used for this type of propaganda. I wholeheartedly support the men and women of the Santa Ana police department, not their union,” Villegas said.

Iglesias, a Republican, said the paid canvassers collecting signatures spread misinformation about her in the predominantly Latino city. In one flyer, which misspells her name, her smiling City Hall photo appears next to one of Donald Trump, angry and screaming: “Inglesias=Trump.” Iglesias shared the flyer on Facebook.

“They were people not from Santa Ana, paid canvassers, who were misguiding individuals,” she said.

One of the union’s talking points, according to Iglesias, is that she supports having a homeless shelter in Santa Ana. But Iglesias has vociferously opposed having her city be the county’s dumping ground for the homeless. Last month, she told county supervisors that their plan to open a new shelter in Santa Ana means they don’t care about the city’s Latino community and consider its residents second-class citizens.

If enough signatures are certified as accurately belonging to Santa Ana voters, the matter goes back to the City Council to decide when it should be placed on the ballot. It’s unclear when a recall election would take place and whether it would necessitate a special election — which could cost the city about $500,000, City Clerk Daisy Gomez said.

It’s unclear whether the recall could be included on the November ballot. Iglesias plans to be on that ballot already — she’s running for mayor.

The Best Response to a Proposed City of Tustin 30 Percent Water Rate “Increase” – Starts with an Attorney – Then an Full Audit of the City of Tustin Water Service – and Possibly a Class Action Lawsuit – It’s been done in Several Other Cities in Orange County. As a Goal – I would Also Expect to be able to Achieve a 30 Percent Rate “Decrease”. We Saved Water and We Saved Money During the Drought – and the City of Tustin Wants to Claw Back Money that We Worked Very Hard to Save.

Editorial –

I think that an Audit of Tustin Water Services would not only find enough – Waste – Inefficiency – Overtime Fraud – Pension Spiking – Contractor Fraud and Overpricing to “eliminate” any Need for a Rate increase – but as a Goal – I would Also Expect to be able to Achieve a 30 Percent Rate “Decrease”.

I’m willing to put up the first one or two thousand dollars to retain a Law firm to get started – later being reimbursed by Taxpayers / Ratepayers who I have No Doubt will be Thrilled with the aspect of an Outside Audit. The Law firm will communicate on behalf of Rate[payers – Making Claims and Demands – the Ratepayers will be Happy to Pay for all of this directly coming form the City of Tustin and Tustin Water Services Budget.

Spending time at Public Hearings and Watching Power Point Presentations is Frivolous as Public Employees and their Council Rubber Stampers – Just Like the PUC in California will Green Light any Possible Increase in Rates Taxes and Revenues. That’s How they Do Business.

Trivia – in 1958 the Tustin Water Works Charged Just $5 per Month for Water – All You Could Use – There Wasn’t Even a Meter.

Tap water may seem free, especially in comparison to Perrier or Evian. But in fact, getting it to kitchen faucets comes with a price tag – and one that is inching upward, Tustin officials say.

“The cost of water has continued to rise annually,” said Michael Grisso, the city’s water services manager.

For the first time in five years, Tustin is looking at passing along those increases to consumers through a rise in rates. Early next year, the City Council will vote on a multi-year, incremental rate hike.

If council members approve the staff proposal, rates almost immediately will increase 6% per year for five years.

Current single-family residential rates are based on an escalating tier structure that starts at 84 cents per unit of water and caps at $4.05 per unit. One unit of water is equal to 748 gallons.

“Costs of operating and maintaining the water system have grown over the years,” Grisso said. “Electricity costs have increased, construction and maintenance costs have increased, material and labor costs have increased. The city is projecting these costs will continue to increase.”

About 80% of Tustin’s water comes from the local groundwater basin managed by the Orange County Water District. While it’s the least expensive source, Grisso said costs to the city have gone up 42% during the last four years.

The rest of the city’s water is imported from the Colorado River and Northern California. Transportation logistics make that water pricier, with costs going up about 10% during the last four years, Grisso said.

The City Council vote will directly follow a public hearing scheduled for Jan. 21.

https://www.ocregister.com/2019/10/08/as-cost-of-delivering-water-climbs-tustin-looks-at-raising-household-rates/

Hangar Fire - "Without Litigation" - City of Tustin Already On the Hook for $90 Million in Clean-Up Costs - "Not Including the Actual Hangar Property" - and Heading for a Billion Dollars - Developers Likely Not Off the Hook Either - Property Value Assessments Undergoing Official Review - Ask Yourself - Would You Buy or Rent at the Tustin Legacy - Remember there's "Another" Hangar Too
Addicted? 1-800-662-HELP
URGENT REMINDER - if You're on Southern California Edison's - "Time to Fuck You" - "Electricity Rate Plan" - "Opt Out Now" - Call Today or Visit the Website - 1-800-810-2369