Anaheim corruption investigation – It Figures that Cannabis is Involved Too – Addicted? – 1-800-662-HELP – Every Deal Ever Made with Disney and Anaheim Now Comes Into Question – Democratic leader coordinated with FBI in Anaheim corruption investigation Melahat Rafiei confirmed that she has acted as a cooperating witness for more than three years.

The Orange County Register May 19, 2022

Longtime Democratic leader and cannabis consultant – Addicted? – Melahat Rafiei on Thursday confirmed she is the FBI’s prime cooperating witness in an unfolding Anaheim corruption investigation.

This week, that investigation stalled a $320 million deal to sell Angel Stadium. It also has led to calls for Mayor Harry Sidhu to resign over corruption allegations and resulted in federal charges against former Anaheim Chamber CEO Todd Ament.

Rafiei, who is a member of the Democratic National Committee and involved in campaigns for a number of prominent candidates, told the Register she’s been cooperating with the FBI in an investigation focused on corruption in Anaheim since 2019. She was arrested then on charges of “theft or bribery” involving federal funds — allegations she denies and that subsequently have been dismissed.

“In 2019, I was approached by the FBI who wrongly believed that I was involved in improperly influencing public officials,” she said in a statement Thursday morning. “I cooperated fully with the FBI — doing what I could to help in their effort to root out corruption in Anaheim city government.”

It was through Rafiei that the FBI “learned that the City of Anaheim was tightly controlled by a small cadre of individuals” including Sidhu and Ament, according to an affidavit filed in federal court Monday, May 16.

She used recording devices from the FBI to tape evidence that is now key to the charges brought against Ament. His eventual cooperation led to evidence that the FBI says indicates Sidhu shared confidential information with Angels Baseball while the city was negotiating the stadium deal in the hope that he would receive campaign contributions in return. The court records also allege that Sidhu concealed and possibly destroyed evidence, tampered with a witness and committed fraud to avoid paying taxes on a helicopter he purchased.

Rafiei, who is the former executive director of the Democratic Party of Orange County, first became involved through her role as a cannabis consultant.

On encouragement from Rafiei, one of her clients — From the Earth, a legal cannabis shop in Santa Ana — gave $225,000 to the Anaheim Chamber’s “cannabis task force,” with the understanding that the money would cover fees for attorneys and canvassers and other services needed to get a cannabis ordinance approved in a new city. Instead, FBI records allege that Ament, with help from an unnamed consultant, used some of that money personally, including for the purchase of a home in Big Bear City.

Asked about the investigation, Dan Zaharoni, CEO of From the Earth, said in an emailed statement: “We are continually disappointed that legitimate, law-abiding cannabis businesses like From The Earth are negatively affected by the corrupt and unethical practices of our existing political leadership. These people are a stain on our industry and must be brought to justice. We certainly intend to take all necessary legal action to hold accountable those who wronged our company.”

Rafiei declined to discuss the case further, adding in her statement that she has “faith in our legal system and I am confident that in the end, I will be vindicated and my name cleared of any involvement in public corruption.”

California’s legal weed industry can’t compete with illicit market – “The divide between legal and illegal is too big a gap to overcome.”

Local government opposition, high taxes and competition from unlicensed businesses are complicating the state’s push to build a thriving legal market.

California’s cannabis law lets local officials decide whether to open the door to cannabis or slam it shut. So far, most are opting for the latter.

By ALEXANDER NIEVES

10/23/2021

LOS ANGELES — California’s cannabis market is booming nearly five years after voters legalized recreational weed. But there’s a catch: the vast majority of pot sales are still underground.

Rather than make cannabis a Main Street fixture, California’s strict regulations have led most industry operators to close shop, flee the state or sell in the state’s illegal market that approaches $8 billion annually, twice the volume of legal sales.

Local government opposition, high taxes and competition from unlicensed businesses are complicating California’s push to build a thriving legal market. Many of those factors are baked into California law, including rules allowing city leaders to shut out licensed cannabis enterprises. Meanwhile, the state has relaxed penalties against illegal operations in the name of racial justice.

Infighting between industry groups and lobbying dysfunction in Sacramento have stalled potential legislative fixes, with no clear end in sight. The scale of those problems has California’s iconic cannabis industry — the legal side, at least — lagging behind other states that have regulated the market.

“You don’t have a real cannabis industry if the dominant portion of it has no interest in being legal,” said Adam Spiker, executive director of the Southern California Coalition, a cannabis trade association. “There’s no other regulated industry in the world that I know of that operates like that.”

Licensed cannabis shops offering legal goods are sparsely scattered across the state — there are roughly 2 per 100,000 people, one of the lowest rates in the nation among states that support legal recreational sales.

By comparison, Oregon has 17.9 retail shops for every 100,000 residents. Colorado boasts a similar ratio, and Washington state’s rate is more than triple California’s.

California has just 823 licensed brick-and-mortar cannabis shops, but close to 3,000 retailers and delivery services operate in the state without a permit, a February 2020 market analysis by Marijuana Business Daily found.

The unchecked cannabis ecosystem has caused major economic and environmental damage in California. Many of the state’s estimated 50,000 illegal cultivation sites have been found to use banned pesticides that can poison wildlife and water supplies and are believed to account for hundreds of millions of gallons in water stolen from farms and neighboring communities each year.

Law enforcement agencies in the last few months alone have broken up sprawling grow operations in the arid Antelope Valley and urban Alameda County, discovering around 50 tons of processed cannabis goods and more than 100,000 plants, a haul valued well above $1 billion.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced earlier this week that the state had seized 165 weapons and more than 33 tons of infrastructure like water lines and toxic chemicals after conducting close to 500 raids this year.

“The victims of illegal marijuana cultivation are many and the toll is severe,” he said during a news conference. “Families whose water supply is polluted by outlawed pesticides, exploited labor exposed to dangerous and illegal working conditions, farmers deprived of clean soil and water.”

California, like many states, has lowered its penalties on illegal marijuana businesses, a response to a disproportionate number of arrests targeting communities of color under drug criminalization. Many in the industry say they generally support criminal justice reforms, but that the current penalty of a misdemeanor and $500 fine is simply too low to dissuade illicit activity.

Unlicensed dispensaries shuttered for city code enforcement violations often pop up again, sometimes right down the street. And cultivation sites like the one raided in Antelope Valley often resume operations just days later, law enforcement officials concede.

Every state establishing a legal market has had to contend with illicit operations, but the underground market in California is far more entrenched. Many of today’s unlicensed businesses legally served customers for decades under the state’s medical marijuana laws that passed in 1996 but went underground after voters approved the recreational pot initiative Proposition 64 passed in 2016. Some operated in cities that banned weed sales, while others balked at the new regulatory fees and taxes.

The new law forced longtime business owners to make tough decisions, said Elizabeth Ashford, vice president of communications at cannabis delivery company Eaze.

“They were totally allowed under the law just minutes ago,” she said looking back to when the new regulations were established. “Did anybody really think those folks would just be like, ‘Well okay, we’re just going to close our doors’?”

California’s cannabis law lets local officials decide whether to open the door to cannabis or slam it shut. So far, most are opting for the latter.

A whopping 68 percent of California cities ban cannabis retail, including wide swaths of the Central Valley. Other areas have imposed strict caps on the number of available licenses, limiting market growth.

San Diego has just 25 pot shops for a population of 1.4 million; San Jose has 16 stores for 1 million people.

Some local officials say the industry harms children or argue dispensaries would attract crime. Others point to the difficulty of drafting ordinances, complying with strict environmental reviews and dealing with potential lawsuits from applicants who aren’t awarded licenses.

Public meetings in places like Mountain View in the Silicon Valley and Anaheim have devolved into hours-long marathons filled with protests and name calling when the topic of allowing cannabis shops comes up.

Spiker, who helps develop local cannabis regulations, said some elected officials fear a pro-cannabis stance could cost them their seats.

“Just because Prop. 64 passed in a community at say 60 percent, it doesn’t mean that the 40 percent that voted ‘no’ won’t organize a recall effort or a strenuous bid to get you thrown out of office your next election,” he said.

The dearth of retail stores — and legal shelf space — gives unlicensed businesses a large, unserved consumer base. It also contributes to an oversupply of goods produced by the state’s 6,000 licensed cultivators that has caused the price of wholesale cannabis to plummet, hurting legal growers.

“Local control has, let’s just be honest, crippled the California market and prevented it from reaching its potential,” said Hirsh Jain, founder of cannabis consulting firm Ananda Strategy.

Industry leaders say there is little chance state lawmakers will take away that power, largely due to fierce support for local control from law enforcement and city and county officials.

Citizen initiatives and Covid-related budget deficits have spurred some jurisdictions to open their arms to weed. By Jain’s count, 28 cities will open their first dispensaries in 2022 and 37 more that will pass a retail ordinance.

Businesses that manage to secure a license have another problem: competing with their unregulated competitors.

The price of cannabis products sold in legal dispensaries can be two to three times higher than nearly identical items sold in unlicensed shops, which aren’t subject to cultivation or excise taxes that drive up costs for retailers.

Some buyers see little incentive to pay more for a legal product.

“Price is the biggest motivator for consumer choice,” Ashford said. “We know that from our own data, there’s no question that if you make things less expensive people will buy them.”

States keep legalizing marijuana, but how legal is legal?

The difference between the legal and the illegal is not always obvious. Underground dispensaries are often indistinguishable from licensed shops and sell similar-looking items that may be counterfeit or diverted from the legal market. Illicit delivery services are also listed right next to legitimate operators on platforms like Google and Yelp.

Regulators warn that products purchased from unlicensed retailers pose a public health risk, pointing to a rash of lung illnesses related to untested vape cartridges that killed 68 people and hospitalized more than 2,800 nationwide in 2019.

Pro-cannabis state lawmakers have tried unsuccessfully to slash the tax burden in the face of opposition from SEIU, the powerful union that helped bankroll the 2016 ballot measure. The union disagrees with the industry argument that reducing tax rates will spur growth and eventually boost tax revenue, said Robert Harris, a lobbyist for SEIU.

“I’ve never heard of an industry that didn’t say, ‘Reduce our taxes, we’ll sell more and you’ll make more,’” he said.

Leaders within the cannabis industry say finding a solution for the tax problem is their top priority for next year. Nicole Elliott, director of the state Department of Cannabis Control, telegraphed that they might get support from Gov. Gavin Newsom, who championed Prop. 64 while running for office in 2016.

“I imagine that the administration will be very happy to partner with the Legislature on those discussions,” she said.

But finding consensus on a tax plan will be challenging. There is disagreement, for instance, about whether a tax cut should happen on the cultivation or retail side.

Lawmakers and Capitol staffers say this disunity makes legislative fixes nearly impossible to pass and perpetuates the status quo. That’s a scenario the industry can’t afford, given “the overhead costs that the illegal guy doesn’t do,” Spiker warned.

“The divide between legal and illegal is too big a gap to overcome.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/10/23/california-legal-illicit-weed-market-516868

The Real Drug Dealers “City Hall ” Don’t Like It when You Don’t Pay Up! – Licensed cannabis businesses in Santa Ana, Los Angeles raided over unpaid taxes – Is it an industry-wide crackdown? If so, some say the timing couldn’t be worse.

April 1, 2022

By BROOKE STAGGS | [email protected] | Orange County Register

Two California Highway Patrol vehicles and a half dozen unmarked vehicles blocked off the parking lot of Super Clinik, a licensed cannabis store in Santa Ana, just after the shop opened at 8 a.m. on the morning of March 18.

With an agent from the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration looking on, several CHP officers went inside, counted out a couple six-inch high stacks of cash and took them from the Birch Street store, according to witness reports and photos from the scene.

Super Clinik owners didn’t respond to multiple requests to speak for this story, while state tax officials said privacy laws prevent them from discussing specific cases. But experts said the operation at the Santa Ana shop had all the hallmarks of a “till tap” civil warrant, which the tax agency uses to seize cash from businesses that haven’t paid sales tax bills despite escalated warnings.

This is the second such operation reported at a longstanding, licensed cannabis shop in Southern California in the past month. In early March, a shop called TLC in Boyle Heights, owned by the well-known industry veterans Jungle Boys, also got raided by the CDTFA and CHP. The business posted video from the incident on its Instagram page, saying officers came in with guns drawn and took more than $100,000 from their cash registers after they paid $18 million in taxes in 2021.

“That’s triggering to all of us because this is what used to happen regularly,” said Dana Cisneros, an attorney who’s worked with cannabis businesses for 15 years.

For decades, law enforcement raided pot shops in California, arresting people on site and seizing goods as businesses operated in the gray space created by loose medical marijuana laws. But with recreational consumption of cannabis legal in California since 2016, and the state giving members of the fledgling industry some leeway, raids of licensed shops have been rare in recent years.

Now, the recent reports of tax raids have industry insiders wondering if state authorities are entering a tougher phase of enforcement when it comes to dealing with licensed operators.

Such an escalation was inevitable on the one hand, as the industry matured. But there’s also evidence that even as most cannabis businesses are paying their tax bills on time, the industry is a bit less likely than others to do so.

The state reports that 99% of all businesses in California pay their sales tax on time each quarter, but the pay-on-time rate for the cannabis industry is about 90%. And with nearly $309 million in tax revenue collected from cannabis businesses in the final quarter of 2021, and nearly $3.5 billion raised since taxes took effect in January 2018, that default rate means cannabis businesses owed the state more than $11 million in past-due taxes at the end of last year.

Add to that another factor — some licensed cannabis operators continue to do work in the unlicensed side of the industry.

Rob Taft, owner of 420 Central in Santa Ana, said he’s long predicted that California and other governments would eventually use tax enforcement to target potential bad actors in the cannabis industry, the way gangster Al Capone was ultimately brought down for tax evasion. In that case, rather than giving businesses leeway, Taft and others suggest the state might have been giving cannabis operators just enough rope to hang themselves.

“We’ve pretty much pounded into (our clients) that the scariest boogeyman in the scope of enforcement is the tax man,” said Hilary Bricken, a cannabis industry attorney in Los Angeles.

Taft and others in the industry said they don’t support anyone not paying their taxes. But they also say there couldn’t be a worse time for the state to start targeting licensed businesses in such a forceful way.

Just 26% of California’s cannabis businesses are turning a profit, according to a January report from the Portland-based data firm Whitney Economics. That’s well below the national average of 42%. Among the 17% of operators who are only breaking even, and the 56% who are losing money, some anecdotally are talking about either leaving California or going back to the illicit market where many of them got their start.

“They’re choking us out,” Taft said.

Where is the protection?

One problem is the persistent existence of the underground cannabis market. It’s tough for licensed operators to start up in California, while it’s not hard for illegal operators to stay in business. As a result, most experts believe the underground cannabis market is about twice as big as the licensed business in California.

That makes tax raids on licensed businesses — by state officials who, in theory, could be stamping out illegal operators — particularly frustrating, Cisneros said.

“I’m not saying anybody should not pay their taxes,” she said. “But where’s the enforcement to protect people who are complying with the law, or at least trying?”

The state’s Department of Cannabis Control has been reluctant in the early years of legalization to make aggressive moves even against unlicensed cannabis businesses. Leaders said they wanted to use a “carrot” rather than a “stick” approach in hopes of getting more illicit operators to move into the regulated market.

While some licensed operators have been frustrated with that approach, Bricken said she’s concerned about the chilling effect that aggressive CDTFA raids will have on efforts to convert more businesses.

“People in the illegal market will see this and it’s another reason to say, ‘Why would I ever transition?’”

The second main factor that licensed businesses say is throttling the industry is the same thing sparking the recent raids: taxes.

Sellers have been raising flags about a need for relief from industry taxes that can easily hit rates of 45%, driving up the cost consumers pay for safe, regulated products and creating a window for unlicensed operators to grab market share. In Sacramento, some lawmakers are pushing to ease cannabis taxes, but most in the industry aren’t confident that they’ll pass.

So in recent months some licensed operators have threatened to withhold their tax payments from the state and put that money into escrow accounts as a way to prove a point. But there’s no evidence that any licensed businesses have followed through on that threat, or that either of the recent CDTFA’s raids had any connection to such an effort.

In the case of Jungle Boys, the company reports it’s been appealing $60,000 in penalties and interest that CDTFA says it owes on a $130,000 tax bill. While that appeal was still pending, the company says the agency came and collected more than what they reportedly owed.

“CDTFA is coming out swinging,” Bricken said. “And they’re the perfect agency to do it because they’re nearly untouchable.”

When asked about till tap operations, agency spokeswoman Tamma Adamek pointed to a document that explains such civil warrants (which typically are executed with help from either the CHP or local police) are issued only after verbal and written collection requests have proven unsuccessful.

The policy states that CDTFA also can collect funds beyond the overdue tax fees to cover the cost of executing the till tap.

That’s why Bricken said she always advises her clients to pay whatever taxes the state says they owe up front, and then appeal to get back any funds that are rightfully theirs.

When businesses get upside down with CDTFA, she said she expects the agency will share that information with the IRS, which can invite federal attention. Reports of raids also can harm relationships with customers, vendors and financers, who already are hard to come by in an industry that’s still considered high risk.

“They are looking to make examples of people,” Bricken said. “And the bigger the target, the more influential the message.”

The CDTFA is not specifically targeting cannabis businesses, Adamek said. But till taps, she explained, do work best with cash-heavy businesses such as bars, gas stations and cannabis stores. While other industries are cash-heavy for different reasons, cannabis operators rely on cash because their product is illegal under federal law and they can struggle to get access to federally-regulated banks.

Rather than risk such drastic action by refusing to pay tax bills, Taft said he’s encouraging licensed businesses to be “good operators” and to protest California’s high cannabis taxes by joining organized efforts to bring rates down. He’s part of a group of licensed business owners that recently filed a petition, for example, asking Santa Ana to lower its local cannabis tax from 8% to 4%.

Hangar Fire - "Without Litigation" - City of Tustin Already On the Hook for $90 Million in Clean-Up Costs - "Not Including the Actual Hangar Property" - and Heading for a Billion Dollars - Developers Likely Not Off the Hook Either - Property Value Assessments Undergoing Official Review - Ask Yourself - Would You Buy or Rent at the Tustin Legacy - Remember there's "Another" Hangar Too
Addicted? 1-800-662-HELP
URGENT REMINDER - if You're on Southern California Edison's - "Time to Fuck You" - "Electricity Rate Plan" - "Opt Out Now" - Call Today or Visit the Website - 1-800-810-2369